The Iron Man Armory Interviews Marvel Editor-in-Chief Joe Quesada
Before he became Marvel's editor-in-chief, the man affectionately known as Joe Q was an artist and later a writer. He wrote Iron Man, volume III, 26-35 as well as co-writing the 2000 Annual. He pencilled a few covers during that run as well. He spoke with The Armory during his IM writing stint.
1. In your opinion, what makes a good Iron Man story, what are the key ingredients?
The key ingredient to me is not putting the armor above Tony as a character.
2. How did you approach writing Iron Man? How do you get into Tony Stark's mind and the Iron Man character?
I just took all those years of emotional baggage that the character has been carrying around and looked to see what resonated with me or what was common with experiences in my life. This allowed me to get into the characters head as best as I could.
3. Where do you see Iron Man (both the book and the character) in the overall Marvel Universe?
To me the character and the book are one of the few tentpoles in the Marvel U.
4. Could you expand on that... Is Iron Man (both the character and the book) overlooked in an X-Men/Spidey market?
I think he tends to be solely based on the fact that he's rich, good looking, brilliant and a super hero. He's very tough for younger readers to relate to. As much as hard core Iron Man fans may hate to hear this, if Tony was younger and creating all this stuff much in the way that Peter created web shooters, he might have been more widely excepted. It's just the facts of publishing in a youth market.
5. When writing Iron Man, or any of the longstanding heroes, how conscious are you of their history and how much of that do you feel obliged to rehash/reference? Do you ever feel burdened by a hero's "baggage?"
It's quite a daunting task to write a character that has as much history as IM has. The trick I believe with characters like him is to tip your hat to continuity but try not to become reverent to it. It's a tough trap not to try to fall into. I always loved the old yellow and red suit, it's the one I remembered as a kid, but I wanted to bring it back for a really good reason that had little to no ties to the past.
6. Obviously the unfolding Sons of Yinsen plotline is a direct link back to Iron Man's origin, changing some long held "beliefs..." Do you think a writer has a duty to a character's past and what are your views on "tinkering" with the origins of heroes?
Well, wait until the arc is done and lets talk. When I was researching the Son's story arc I was frankly appalled at the fact that Bryne had twisted the origin in the way that he did. I really don't want to get into it but you can fill in the blanks. Anyway, the story I wanted to tell sort of fell in-between the cracks of what's known as IM's original origin. I hope everybody digs the outcome.
7. Was there any pressure to extend any of Kurt Busiek's plotlines, or were you given free reign, a clean slate?
No, I had total free reign. The only dangling plotline was the Madame Mask scenario which Kurt told me he wanted to take care of on his own in the AV's. I have had a blast however playing around with Rumiko (I know that sounds terrible), she's such a great character!